Like Morgan Reynolds proved in his 2007 Qui-Tam whistleblower case, that the 9/11 truther talking heads like Richard Gage and Ted Walter DOES NOT want people to know about?
The Suspension of Newtonian Physics on 9/11
A Plane conversation with Dr Morgan Reynolds & 9/11 Revisionist
Exposed FOIA documents already confirm that ALL of the alleged planes were still airborne, well after they allegedly crashed. YOU know this, yet you play the same games as Ray Kraaijenhagen, that I mentioned here in my article, pertaining to the possible CIA spook, Rebekah Roth...
Then also go ask those two arseholes from the "International Center for 9/11 Justice", suppression, Ted Walter and Piers Robinson, why they are trying to sell people and especially senator Ron Johnson, on the absolute bullshit narrative of remote controlled planes and why they are IGNORING Dr Morgan Reynolds' 2007 Qui-Tam whistleblower case?
O, so the fact that you have TWO separate Qui-Tam cases filed in 2007 and all the truth movement talking heads have done is to discourage people from looking at the evidence presented in these two cases, all whilst going at the evidence presented in a distractive way, like NOT mentioning the impossible flight physics, the impossible impact dynamics, misrepresenting the seismic readings and so much more.....
What the hell is your problem Bob?
You afraid you going to be unfriended by a bunch of truth-traitors and professional, career fraudsters? You love having your chats with Gene Laratonda, Gage and the rest of these vermin?
Do you have no intellectual humility?
You cool with disrespecting those that lost their lives on 9/11?
few things I'd be happier to see than the justification for the fraudulent p.a.t.r.i.o.t
act being thrown to the wolves, it'd put pressure on our pseudo-representatives to stop renewing the damn thing and revoke every agency it created and empowered
I absolutely agree that the most likely method was a DEW.
What concerns me about the conclusion is that AI started to forge documents in January, 2025, and the culprits must have tried to hide all incriminating evidence. 24 years after the event, not much has changed.
Moreover, the most important part would be to get rid of the (un)Patriot(ic) Act, and nobody is demanding or even mentioning that...
Barbara Honegger's presentation titled "Behind the Smoke Curtain" in Seattle's Town Hall Theater, January 12, 2013, on what happened and what didn't happen at the Pentagon on September 11, 2001.
Barbara Honegger has no credibility and she is part and parcel of the same disingenuous clan of misfits, like Richard Gage, David Chandler, Jonathan Cole, Ted Walter and Piers Robinson...
The Pentagon whistle-blower, Adam Eisenberg has some rather damming evidence against her, which will be published in his soon to be released book...
She clearly shows the Pentagon attack was fake, which means 9/11 was a inside job. The REAL target of the pentagon attack was the auditors office striving to find the 2 trillion dollars GONE MISSING that Rumsfeld mentioned the DAY BEFORE. The office was completely destroyed. A few 9/11 Arab pilots were found alive in the middle east.
Norman, Norman, Norman... So now comes the pivot to overtly profiteering. Why am I not surprised? Perhaps because you have made it your goal to wedge as hard as you can between "camp 3 truthers" and Jewish Israeli involvement in 9/11, including ignoring the Mossad agents in NYC (Urban Moving Systemd), Philip Zelikow, Dov Zakheim, misrepresenting Gelitin (NOT called Gelatin) as if debunking they are from Isreal debuks Jewish interest in 9/11.
Yep, think the pieces are reallly falling into place now.
Edit: I had trouble donating via Paypal but it was just a temporary issue with my debit card.
Before I realised that I posted the following (which may still be worth including here): you might want to think about setting up a https://ko-fi.com/ account, or Patreon, or Subscribestar, or something else, or all of the above. Either way, keep up the good work.
Thanks, I hadn't seen it. I'm in two minds about this sort of thing. Overall it's definitely a good thing. I don't know who Ty Roberts is but he speaks the truth and actually gets it on record in a video with a sitting congressman. He also allows him to answer a question and that answer is a display of total ignorance, but only to someone who has already looked at the evidence and studied it for themselves. So that's a positive, and it also allows people like you to post the clip and share it with more people who are already searching, so that's also good.
But is this congressman going to look into it now? Does he have any intention of finding out the truth and actually doing something about it from his position as a congressman? I doubt it. That's not what politicians are for. Certainly not now, but it may never have been (with the possible exception of some of the founding fathers and a handful of exceptions in each generation thereafter.)
I don't know for a fact that this particular congressman isn't an exception, but based on his answers it seems unlikely given his willful ignorance over 24 years after the event.
BTW, I just watched some of the recent Ian Carroll interview on Tucker Carlson. Carroll says he was 9 when 9/11 happened and his generation knows that when you see the government acting this way (having spoken throughout the interview about the Las Vegas shooting) it's because they're covering up one of these things. Tucker responds "By the way, when I act that way I'm covering something up. When you do too, that's a human thing. If I'm hiding something, if I'm lying about something there's a reason. I'm not doing it - unless I'm some total sociopath freak - I'm not doing it for fun. I'm doing it because I'm trying to conceal something."
What is it they say? When someone tells you who they are, believe them.
It's a difficult one with Tucker Carlson because I do think he does a lot of interviews that reveal a lot of truth and he's attacked for that by the right people, which does seem to be genuine. But he does also tell lies about 9/11. They're not mistakes at this point, they're lies. And occasionally it's as if his subconscious leaks out an admission about that. I think this is an example of exactly that.
TC: So what you're saying is that mass formation psychology clearly has taken hold among a bunch of people where it's like they just can't think clearly.
IC: Well I don't think that it takes hold by accident. I think that it's the kind of thing that only happens when you have a massive propaganda campaign and basically a state-sponsored operation to control the information space ... [Tucker cuts him off.]
TC: Well there's definitely some of that, flat out we know because I'm watching it and I'm not gonna, whatever, I should just shut up now because I know too many people involved and I love them all, honestly.
Like Morgan Reynolds proved in his 2007 Qui-Tam whistleblower case, that the 9/11 truther talking heads like Richard Gage and Ted Walter DOES NOT want people to know about?
The Suspension of Newtonian Physics on 9/11
A Plane conversation with Dr Morgan Reynolds & 9/11 Revisionist
Article & Interview: https://911revision.substack.com/p/the-suspension-of-newtonian-physics-0c6
Exposed FOIA documents already confirm that ALL of the alleged planes were still airborne, well after they allegedly crashed. YOU know this, yet you play the same games as Ray Kraaijenhagen, that I mentioned here in my article, pertaining to the possible CIA spook, Rebekah Roth...
Then also go ask those two arseholes from the "International Center for 9/11 Justice", suppression, Ted Walter and Piers Robinson, why they are trying to sell people and especially senator Ron Johnson, on the absolute bullshit narrative of remote controlled planes and why they are IGNORING Dr Morgan Reynolds' 2007 Qui-Tam whistleblower case?
Just listen to their absolute drivel - https://mailchi.mp/ic911.org/help-ic911-do-even-more-groundbreaking-research-in-2026?e=ba7dfd4da0
The 9/11 Plane & No Plane debate settled
Most probably the best distraction of WHAT happened on September 11, 2001
Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/911-the-plane-no-plane-argument
9/11 "Truthers" vs. The Seismic Evidence
No Primary or Secondary Waves Recorded
Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/911-truthers-vs-the-seismic-evidence
O, so the fact that you have TWO separate Qui-Tam cases filed in 2007 and all the truth movement talking heads have done is to discourage people from looking at the evidence presented in these two cases, all whilst going at the evidence presented in a distractive way, like NOT mentioning the impossible flight physics, the impossible impact dynamics, misrepresenting the seismic readings and so much more.....
What the hell is your problem Bob?
You afraid you going to be unfriended by a bunch of truth-traitors and professional, career fraudsters? You love having your chats with Gene Laratonda, Gage and the rest of these vermin?
Do you have no intellectual humility?
You cool with disrespecting those that lost their lives on 9/11?
fingers crossed the subheading is accurate.
few things I'd be happier to see than the justification for the fraudulent p.a.t.r.i.o.t
act being thrown to the wolves, it'd put pressure on our pseudo-representatives to stop renewing the damn thing and revoke every agency it created and empowered
I absolutely agree that the most likely method was a DEW.
What concerns me about the conclusion is that AI started to forge documents in January, 2025, and the culprits must have tried to hide all incriminating evidence. 24 years after the event, not much has changed.
Moreover, the most important part would be to get rid of the (un)Patriot(ic) Act, and nobody is demanding or even mentioning that...
Do you know who wrote the Patriot Act?
Have a listen: https://x.com/i/status/1953050323410444343
How can I send funds outside of PayPal mafia a Substack digital ID enforcer
Well, Substack uses "Stripe" and they do not link with South Africa, so the Substack platform does not pay out to South African writers...
So, PayPal it is, or if you want, you can do Crypto?
Paypal.me: paypal.me/911Revision
BitCoin Wallet - 3ESN2XA5riWWqd5EojerRfjrVgPE8o3jko
LiteCoin Wallet - MCM1YE8uiHGmdYjGCsBA5FuHpgsHNaPYgt
Ethereum Wallet – Use ERC20 network - 0x8B9785Da5A0Be391E46d401241D9DC8F220db4CD
Behind the Smoke Curtain - The 9/11 Pentagon Attack by Barbara Honegger
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sALa-E56Zms
Barbara Honegger's presentation titled "Behind the Smoke Curtain" in Seattle's Town Hall Theater, January 12, 2013, on what happened and what didn't happen at the Pentagon on September 11, 2001.
Barbara Honegger has no credibility and she is part and parcel of the same disingenuous clan of misfits, like Richard Gage, David Chandler, Jonathan Cole, Ted Walter and Piers Robinson...
The Pentagon whistle-blower, Adam Eisenberg has some rather damming evidence against her, which will be published in his soon to be released book...
The PentaCon on 9/11
When a missile AND a plane did not hit a target
Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/the-pentacon-on-911
She clearly shows the Pentagon attack was fake, which means 9/11 was a inside job. The REAL target of the pentagon attack was the auditors office striving to find the 2 trillion dollars GONE MISSING that Rumsfeld mentioned the DAY BEFORE. The office was completely destroyed. A few 9/11 Arab pilots were found alive in the middle east.
Yet, you seem to have to read my comment again - Barbara Honegger is part of the government sanctioned COINTELPRO 9/11 "truth" movement cover-up....
Time for you to pull your head out of your arse...
...government sanctioned? When she proves 9/11 was an inside job.
Thx for finally agreeing!
I’m NOT agreeing with you and you need to pull your head out of your arse..
Barbara Honegger is part of the bigger cover-up of what happened on 9/11.
Wake up, stop being gaslit by these truth-traitors…
Are you that dumb?
wow you have been busy!! Keep up the good work hun!! x
Thank you Mystic, so have you ;-)
Have a great New year's party and looking forward to collaborating with you in 2026!
Norman, Norman, Norman... So now comes the pivot to overtly profiteering. Why am I not surprised? Perhaps because you have made it your goal to wedge as hard as you can between "camp 3 truthers" and Jewish Israeli involvement in 9/11, including ignoring the Mossad agents in NYC (Urban Moving Systemd), Philip Zelikow, Dov Zakheim, misrepresenting Gelitin (NOT called Gelatin) as if debunking they are from Isreal debuks Jewish interest in 9/11.
Yep, think the pieces are reallly falling into place now.
Dalton, Dalton Dalton, your comment makes no sense.
You want to discuss this face to face, or do you only have balls behind your keyboard?
The Israeli Art Students, Gelatin & E-Team PSYOP
It's a wonderful distraction for the intellectually lazy.
Article and video: https://911revision.substack.com/p/the-israeli-art-students-gelatin
9/11 Truth Suppression Timeline
"The best way to control the opposition is to lead it ourselves." - Vladimir Lenin
Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/911-truth-suppression-timeline
Sure.
Have a read:
Seeking the whole truth of September 11, 2001
An open letter to the 9/11 truth movement from a 9/11 Jersey Girl, Patricia Casazza
Read more: https://911revision.substack.com/p/seeking-the-whole-truth-of-september
Edit: I had trouble donating via Paypal but it was just a temporary issue with my debit card.
Before I realised that I posted the following (which may still be worth including here): you might want to think about setting up a https://ko-fi.com/ account, or Patreon, or Subscribestar, or something else, or all of the above. Either way, keep up the good work.
Happy New Year!
Happy new year to you too! :-)
You might not have seen this: https://substack.com/@911revision/note/c-194677286
Thanks, I hadn't seen it. I'm in two minds about this sort of thing. Overall it's definitely a good thing. I don't know who Ty Roberts is but he speaks the truth and actually gets it on record in a video with a sitting congressman. He also allows him to answer a question and that answer is a display of total ignorance, but only to someone who has already looked at the evidence and studied it for themselves. So that's a positive, and it also allows people like you to post the clip and share it with more people who are already searching, so that's also good.
But is this congressman going to look into it now? Does he have any intention of finding out the truth and actually doing something about it from his position as a congressman? I doubt it. That's not what politicians are for. Certainly not now, but it may never have been (with the possible exception of some of the founding fathers and a handful of exceptions in each generation thereafter.)
I don't know for a fact that this particular congressman isn't an exception, but based on his answers it seems unlikely given his willful ignorance over 24 years after the event.
BTW, I just watched some of the recent Ian Carroll interview on Tucker Carlson. Carroll says he was 9 when 9/11 happened and his generation knows that when you see the government acting this way (having spoken throughout the interview about the Las Vegas shooting) it's because they're covering up one of these things. Tucker responds "By the way, when I act that way I'm covering something up. When you do too, that's a human thing. If I'm hiding something, if I'm lying about something there's a reason. I'm not doing it - unless I'm some total sociopath freak - I'm not doing it for fun. I'm doing it because I'm trying to conceal something."
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r_Vt_Lo5SiE&t=8153s
What is it they say? When someone tells you who they are, believe them.
It's a difficult one with Tucker Carlson because I do think he does a lot of interviews that reveal a lot of truth and he's attacked for that by the right people, which does seem to be genuine. But he does also tell lies about 9/11. They're not mistakes at this point, they're lies. And occasionally it's as if his subconscious leaks out an admission about that. I think this is an example of exactly that.
Edit: Just watching the end of the interview and there's another bit worth pointing out - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r_Vt_Lo5SiE&t=8500s
TC: So what you're saying is that mass formation psychology clearly has taken hold among a bunch of people where it's like they just can't think clearly.
IC: Well I don't think that it takes hold by accident. I think that it's the kind of thing that only happens when you have a massive propaganda campaign and basically a state-sponsored operation to control the information space ... [Tucker cuts him off.]
TC: Well there's definitely some of that, flat out we know because I'm watching it and I'm not gonna, whatever, I should just shut up now because I know too many people involved and I love them all, honestly.